Here’s a news flash that most of us don’t want to hear: effective research requires planning. Comments like those above generally come from people who have no established research objective other than simply wanting to find some about their ancestors. They mine the Internet or the library in haphazard fashion hoping to stumble across a nugget of information. I do that too, but I have a name for it: it is called recreation, not research, and I engage in it without the expectation of finding anything. If I do find something, I rejoice. If I don’t find anything, I don’t become frustrated because I have no real expectation of doing so.
Research, to be effective, has to be planned, specific, and targeted.
The vehicle we should use is the research plan. It requires effort before the
actual research begins, and that is why many don’t use one. Remember the saying—if
you don’t know where you are going, you won’t know when you get there. Every trip needs a map, and if research is a
trip, then the research plan is the map. It is meant to give you focus, reduce
your search to bite-sized objectives, separate what you know from what you don’t
know, and bring what to do know to bear on your objective. In other words it
does what any plan should do for you; it increases your chances for success.
The research plan consists of five parts: the objective,
known facts, working hypothesis, identified sources, and research strategy.
The objective is a statement of what it is you want to learn
about your ancestor. You should limit this to a specific item such as a
marriage date, a maiden name, etc. After getting all of the “easy” information
about your ancestors, this focus on specific pieces of information is necessary
for success.
Next identify all of the information you already know about
the ancestor in question. Be sure to rate the accuracy of what you know. Is it
credible information or is it speculation?
The working hypothesis is the possible/probable conclusion
that you hope to prove or disprove through your research. Think of this as your
best first estimate of what the answer might be based on what you know. The
working hypothesis gives an idea of how to formulate the last two elements of
your plan, the potential sources and the research strategy.
Next is a listing of the sources that are most likely to
yield support for your hypothesis and achieve your objective. Consider such
things as census records, deeds, probate records, military pension files, etc.
Identify not only the possible sources, but also the repositories where those
resources can be found and examined.
The research strategy is a product of putting the foregoing
information together…it is your plan of attack. What resources should be
researched first—perhaps information from one source is required to make best
use of another source. Perhaps you need to solidify some of your “flakey”
information before you can proceed.
Now, and only now, are ready to start actual research. The
plan should be a guide; rely on it, but not so rabidly that you are not willing
to revise it. Your research may reveal new sources to explore and new elements
for your strategy. Be flexible, but not to a fault.
And what if you still come up dry? That is merely an
indication that you need to redefine your objective and hypothesis to match the
new information you have found. Perhaps you were too aggressive in your
objective and there was other information you needed to focus on first.
This may sound like a lot of work, but the alternative is
the often frustrating “shotgun” approach that we all have used. So aimlessly
nose around in your research if you wish, and revel in the nuggets you find,
but don’t be discouraged if you come up empty or become over whelmed. Backup
and do a research plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment